Membership

DonateNow


The following op-ed appeared in the September 7, 2003 Memphis Commercial Appeal.

Alabama's voters must chart course

Guest columnist Nell Levin of Nashville is organizer for the Tennessee Alliance for Progress.

The state of Alabama is standing at a crossroads, the same crossroads where Tennessee waited in July 2002 as lawmakers debated whether to reform its antiquated and regressive tax structure.

Unfortunately, Tennessee took the path of least resistance when the General Assembly voted to raise its sales tax by 1 cent, giving Tennessee one of the highest sales tax rates in the nation.

Let us hope that Alabama voters choose a different path when they vote Tuesday on a referendum to reform their ailing tax structure. Republican Gov. Bob Riley is proposing a $1.2 billion tax package that, among other things, will ease the burden on lower-income people and increase taxes on farms and timber tracts of more than 2,000 acres.

The potential impact of this referendum on Alabama is momentous.

Will Alabama, like Tennessee, continue to be known as a cheap labor state, where too large a percentage of the population is under-educated? Where high school dropout rates are among the highest in the nation? Where state services are minimal? Where higher education is underfunded?

Or will it become a leader in the New South by creating a modern tax structure that can fund education and other necessary services adequately, and thereby attract the high-tech jobs of the future?

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy in Washington compiles a list of the 10 most regressive tax structures in the United States. Tennessee is No. 3 on that infamous list, and Alabama is No. 10. Both states have antiquated tax structures that disproportionately tax lower-income people while allowing wealthy individuals to escape paying their fair share.

Their tax structures have an inherent structural deficit, which is a fancy way of saying that revenue generated does not keep up with the state's necessary expenses.

Both Tennessee and Alabama tax groceries with a sales tax that hits working families the hardest. It is unfortunate that Riley's tax reform plan does not remove Alabama's sales tax on food. As University of Alabama law professor Susan Pace Hamill points out in her paper "The Least of These: Tax Reform and the Commands of Faith," policies that milk more revenue from those who have the least are unethical, especially if one professes to be a Christian.

Such policies are also irrational and have resulted in chronic revenue problems for both states.

Unlike Tennessee, Alabama has an income tax, but it is a regressive one that kicks in when a family earns as little as $4,600 a year. The state also grants taxpayers a full deduction on the federal income tax they pay, a provision that primarily helps higher-income citizens. As a result, those who earn less than $13,000 a year pay twice as large a share of their earnings in state and local taxes as do citizens who earn more than $229,000.

Under Riley's proposed reform, Alabama residents wouldn't pay any state income tax unless their annual income reached $17,000 this year - and eventually, $20,000. Sixty-seven percent of Alabamians would pay the same taxes, or less, under Riley's plan that they do now.

Like Alabama, Tennessee is struggling to recover from the recession. Gov. Phil Bredesen barely had time to climb out of his inaugural tuxedo before he was facing large deficits, in spite of the 2002 sales tax increase that generated $933 million in new revenue. Bredesen's response was to cut state department budgets across the board by 9 percent.

Such cuts in spending hit low- and moderate-income people with a double whammy: higher taxes and fewer services. They are not a formula that will create a healthy, prosperous population and encourage economic growth.

Although recent polls suggest they will not, I hope the people of Alabama will choose to go down the road of progress by voting for tax reform this week. Their state could become a model for Tennessee to follow the next time we face a revenue shortfall.

Tennessee's sales tax cannot be allowed to go much higher. Vital government services have already been cut. Let us hope that our state leaders will have the fortitude to take the right road the next time around.

To contact Nell Levin, E-mail to: nellrose@earthlink.net. For information on the Tennessee Alliance for Progress, visit www.tennesseeallianceforprogress.org

 

Home | About Us | Principles | News Archives | Event Calendar | Self-Sufficiency
Memberships: Individual Organizational | Contact us | Email List

© 2002-2003 Tennessee Alliance for Progress
All Rights Reserved.

P.O. Box 60338 Nashville, TN 37206, 888-903-9576